Podcast: Play in new window | Download
Subscribe: Spotify | Email | TuneIn | RSS
Imagine a tennis ball dropped on cement – it immediately bounces back to your hand.
Now imagine dropping that same ball on a sandy beach.
The bounce of a tennis ball on pavement is a form of resilience, but it’s important to note that resilience is not just an inherent property of the ball.
Context matters just as much.
Read More
Podcast: Play in new window | Download
Subscribe: Spotify | Email | TuneIn | RSS
In 2011, a whopping 36,000 science and technology grad students earned their PhDs. That same year, about 3,000 faculty positions were created. So why did you feel like a failure when you decided to step off the tenure track?
Read More
Podcast: Play in new window | Download
Subscribe: Spotify | Email | TuneIn | RSS
It’s Friday morning, and you promised your PI a draft of your paper before the weekend. The trouble is, you lost a lot of time this week to distractions.
Monday you had lab meeting and a few other planning sessions. Tuesday you worked from home but got sucked into cleaning the kitchen and folding laundry instead of writing.
You don’t remember why Thursday wasn’t more productive. You started out the day feeling anxious about the deadline, and then spend a few hours (hours?!) online shopping to numb the anxiety.
And here you are on Friday with less than 7 hours left until your deadline and your stress levels are maxed out. So why is it that your main desire is to watch videos on TikTok?
Read More
Podcast: Play in new window | Download
Subscribe: Spotify | Email | TuneIn | RSS
Most graduate students look on their research advisors as a mentor – hoping for guidance on science, career, and life in general.
But even a superstar PI can’t provide that kind of comprehensive mentorship for all students all the time, and those stellar advisors are rare indeed.
That’s why EVERY student needs to think about identifying and building relationships with three distinct types of mentor through graduate school and beyond.
Read More
Podcast: Play in new window | Download
Subscribe: Spotify | Email | TuneIn | RSS
It starts innocently enough with an email.
This mail is with reference of your article published in the Journal of Cell Science, which is of good quality and making a good impact in the research field. In which you provided this email address to contact you.
We would be glad if you submit your manuscript to our journal, we do accept and publish Research/Review/Case reports/Mini review/Commentaries, round the year.
Unfortunately, if you fall for the scam and submit your next manuscript to this predatory journal, you’ll lose both your money, AND your research.
This week, we talk with Dr. Antonio Peramo, PhD of scientificwritingcourses.com, about predatory journals and how YOU can identify and avoid them.
Read More